Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider moving ApiDocs outside of the documentation. #3058

Open
4 tasks
petertonysmith94 opened this issue Aug 29, 2024 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #3237
Open
4 tasks

Consider moving ApiDocs outside of the documentation. #3058

petertonysmith94 opened this issue Aug 29, 2024 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #3237
Assignees
Labels
chore Issue is a chore docs Requests pertinent to documentation

Comments

@petertonysmith94
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

Currently our API docs are appended to our handcrafted documentation (example). This has been the source of a couple of issues and it is aesthetically unappealing in the docs-hub. We should explore the possibility of hosting this ourself (via Vercel perhaps), and adding a reference to this (like the Rust SDK does here).

  • Deploy ApiDocs
  • Add reference within our docs to this new deployment
  • Remove all legacy resources that enabled this process
  • Ensure compatibility with the docs-hub
@petertonysmith94 petertonysmith94 added chore Issue is a chore docs Requests pertinent to documentation labels Aug 29, 2024
@arboleya arboleya added temp-p2 and removed temp-M labels Sep 7, 2024
@arboleya arboleya added the temp:notion label Sep 8, 2024 — with Linear
@arboleya arboleya added the temp-linear label Sep 8, 2024 — with Linear
@danielbate danielbate self-assigned this Oct 2, 2024
@danielbate danielbate linked a pull request Oct 2, 2024 that will close this issue
4 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
chore Issue is a chore docs Requests pertinent to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants