UNCOMMON•GOODS release mechanism problem. Should some kind of randomization mechanism be added, if possible.

[snakezhu]

Discussion on whether there is any problem with the UNCOMMON•GOODS launch model. I remember CASEY once said that he wanted to make the runes interesting, but as the only hard-coded token, it did not make the runes interesting. On the contrary, it was very boring, with continuous MINT and continuous passing of blocks. CASEY said long The purpose of the cycle is to eliminate speculation, but speculation always has good and bad consequences. Can you say that speculation is not responsible for the development of BTC to its current scale? Especially in the early stages, speculation can increase exposure and new user groups. Then some of the speculative users can also become loyal user groups. The launch model of UNCOMMON•GOODS is actually very boring. Apart from bringing benefits to arbitrageurs and miners, it does not even consider the holders who intervened early. Shouldn't we find a reasonable balance among the three parties? I suggest that if possible UNCOMMON•GOODS can be released with the block, but some kind of random mechanism should continue to be added to produce randomness. Isn't this more interesting?