Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature Request] Simulate uncertainty of state and observations #54

Open
c-salmi opened this issue Sep 21, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

[Feature Request] Simulate uncertainty of state and observations #54

c-salmi opened this issue Sep 21, 2022 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@c-salmi
Copy link
Collaborator

c-salmi commented Sep 21, 2022

🚀 Feature Request

Include customizable uncertainty to help make the benchmarks more representative of real scenarios.

Motivation

At this moment the planner will have access to the ground truth state and observation (in the form of obstacle positions) from the physics simulator. However, in the real world this will not be the case. Including customizable uncertainty could help make the benchmarks more representative of real scenarios.

@c-salmi c-salmi added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 21, 2022
@maxspahn
Copy link
Collaborator

This should probably be solved inside the simulation environments. Then, a function (or option) is exposed to the application, like in this case the localPlannerBench.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants