Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CPDLP-3510] npq internal api revisit fallback for funding eligibility logic in npq #1741

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mooktakim
Copy link
Contributor

Context

Ticket: https://dfedigital.atlassian.net.mcas.ms/browse/CPDLP-3510

Changes proposed in this pull request

  • Replace all the Rails.application.config.npq_separation[:ecf_api_disabled] flags to use Feature.ecf_api_disabled?
  • Updated Ecf::NpqProfileUpdater spec to include one more test

@mooktakim mooktakim force-pushed the 3510-npq-internal-api-revisit-fallback-for-funding-eligibility-logic-in-npq branch from 228d473 to 48eccdb Compare September 25, 2024 15:53
Copy link

Copy link
Collaborator

@cwrw cwrw left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @mooktakim is it ok if we only focus on swapping out the feature flag on the funding eligibility section? as there is another ticket to tackle those which will change their location?

Copy link
Contributor

@leandroalemao leandroalemao left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All good past Abeer's comment.. also Is the logic behind accepted_applications and with_targeted_delivery_funding_eligibility the same as in ECF?


it "returns nil" do
it ".call returns nil" do
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it "returns nil" do ... ?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

those changes reverted now

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it was because call was tested but tsf_data_field_update wasn't.

@leandroalemao leandroalemao self-assigned this Sep 26, 2024
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Sep 26, 2024

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants