Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(applicationset): Add FlatList option to cluster generator - Fixes #20212 #20231

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

OpenGuidou
Copy link

@OpenGuidou OpenGuidou commented Oct 4, 2024

Fixes #20212

Checklist:

  • Either (a) I've created an enhancement proposal and discussed it with the community, (b) this is a bug fix, or (c) this does not need to be in the release notes.
  • The title of the PR states what changed and the related issues number (used for the release note).
  • The title of the PR conforms to the Toolchain Guide
  • I've included "Closes [ISSUE #]" or "Fixes [ISSUE #]" in the description to automatically close the associated issue.
  • I've updated both the CLI and UI to expose my feature, or I plan to submit a second PR with them.
  • Does this PR require documentation updates?
  • I've updated documentation as required by this PR.
  • I have signed off all my commits as required by DCO
  • I have written unit and/or e2e tests for my change. PRs without these are unlikely to be merged.
  • My build is green (troubleshooting builds).
  • My new feature complies with the feature status guidelines.
  • I have added a brief description of why this PR is necessary and/or what this PR solves.
  • Optional. My organization is added to USERS.md.
  • Optional. For bug fixes, I've indicated what older releases this fix should be cherry-picked into (this may or may not happen depending on risk/complexity).

@OpenGuidou OpenGuidou requested review from a team as code owners October 4, 2024 13:59
Copy link

bunnyshell bot commented Oct 4, 2024

✅ Preview Environment deployed on Bunnyshell

Component Endpoints
argocd https://argocd-5iv6kn.bunnyenv.com/
argocd-ttyd https://argocd-web-cli-5iv6kn.bunnyenv.com/

See: Environment Details | Pipeline Logs

Available commands (reply to this comment):

  • 🔴 /bns:stop to stop the environment
  • 🚀 /bns:deploy to redeploy the environment
  • /bns:delete to remove the environment

Copy link

bunnyshell bot commented Oct 4, 2024

✅ Preview Environment created on Bunnyshell but will not be auto-deployed

See: Environment Details

Available commands (reply to this comment):

  • 🚀 /bns:deploy to deploy the environment

@OpenGuidou OpenGuidou changed the title (feat) - Add FlatList option to cluster generator (feat) - Add FlatList option to cluster generator - Fixes #20212 Oct 4, 2024
@OpenGuidou OpenGuidou changed the title (feat) - Add FlatList option to cluster generator - Fixes #20212 (feat): Add FlatList option to cluster generator - Fixes #20212 Oct 4, 2024
@OpenGuidou OpenGuidou changed the title (feat): Add FlatList option to cluster generator - Fixes #20212 feat(applicationset): Add FlatList option to cluster generator - Fixes #20212 Oct 4, 2024
@speedfl
Copy link
Contributor

speedfl commented Oct 4, 2024

LGTM !

@speedfl speedfl self-assigned this Oct 4, 2024
@speedfl
Copy link
Contributor

speedfl commented Oct 4, 2024

@OpenGuidou Maybe the array will be overridden if we have multiple cluster generator. Could you please test it ?

@OpenGuidou
Copy link
Author

@OpenGuidou Maybe the array will be overridden if we have multiple cluster generator. Could you please test it ?

As the values and template can be different in each cluster generator, I would not risk to flat list the flat lists 😄
I would say, if you agree, that it's acceptable to keep the factorization to a single cluster generator only.

@speedfl
Copy link
Contributor

speedfl commented Oct 4, 2024

@OpenGuidou Maybe the array will be overridden if we have multiple cluster generator. Could you please test it ?

As the values and template can be different in each cluster generator, I would not risk to flat list the flat lists 😄 I would say, if you agree, that it's acceptable to keep the factorization to a single cluster generator only.

You are right. We will have one app per generator. We will then have one app of n clusters and one app of m clusters. So it should not be a problem.

@speedfl
Copy link
Contributor

speedfl commented Oct 4, 2024

@ishitasequeira if you have some time 🙂

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 4, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 55.98%. Comparing base (1c6ec19) to head (228b6ab).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #20231      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   55.96%   55.98%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         322      322              
  Lines       44546    44559      +13     
==========================================
+ Hits        24929    24948      +19     
  Misses      17049    17049              
+ Partials     2568     2562       -6     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

ApplicationSet: accessing cluster list inside template without creating a single element per cluster
2 participants