Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CLN] Separate validation and transformation logic #2899

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

atroyn
Copy link
Contributor

@atroyn atroyn commented Oct 4, 2024

Description of changes

Summarize the changes made by this PR.

  • Improvements & Bug fixes
    • ...
  • New functionality
    • ...

Test plan

How are these changes tested?

  • Tests pass locally with pytest for python, yarn test for js, cargo test for rust

Documentation Changes

Are all docstrings for user-facing APIs updated if required? Do we need to make documentation changes in the docs repository?

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 4, 2024

Please tag your PR title with one of: [ENH | BUG | DOC | TST | BLD | PERF | TYP | CLN | CHORE]. See https://docs.trychroma.com/contributing#contributing-code-and-ideas

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 4, 2024

Reviewer Checklist

Please leverage this checklist to ensure your code review is thorough before approving

Testing, Bugs, Errors, Logs, Documentation

  • Can you think of any use case in which the code does not behave as intended? Have they been tested?
  • Can you think of any inputs or external events that could break the code? Is user input validated and safe? Have they been tested?
  • If appropriate, are there adequate property based tests?
  • If appropriate, are there adequate unit tests?
  • Should any logging, debugging, tracing information be added or removed?
  • Are error messages user-friendly?
  • Have all documentation changes needed been made?
  • Have all non-obvious changes been commented?

System Compatibility

  • Are there any potential impacts on other parts of the system or backward compatibility?
  • Does this change intersect with any items on our roadmap, and if so, is there a plan for fitting them together?

Quality

  • Is this code of a unexpectedly high quality (Readability, Modularity, Intuitiveness)

Copy link
Contributor Author

atroyn commented Oct 4, 2024

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

Join @atroyn and the rest of your teammates on Graphite Graphite

@atroyn atroyn changed the title Record & Validators [CLN] Separate validation and transformation logic Oct 4, 2024
@atroyn atroyn force-pushed the anton/separate_validation_logic branch from dbbaf3d to 3052f80 Compare October 5, 2024 20:44
@atroyn atroyn force-pushed the anton/separate_validation_logic branch from 3052f80 to 61b96f3 Compare October 6, 2024 00:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant