Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add test for transitively requiring a module that is already cached #106

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jalfd
Copy link

@jalfd jalfd commented Jan 31, 2024

Given a module A, which is required by B, which again is required by C, one would expect the following to work:

  1. require module B
  2. quibble module A
  3. load module C

We would expect module C to reference B, which references the quibbled version of A. Instead, it references the original non-quibbled version.

This seems to happen because the loader, when processing C's require('./B'), sees that B itself is not quibbled, and therefore loads it normally.

And because B is already cached, and that version references the non-quibbled version of A, we pull in the non-quibbled A as well.

This commit just adds a (failing) test for the issue. I don't have a sufficient understanding of quibble's internals to try to write a fix as well.

Given a module A, which is required by B, which again is required by C,
one would expect the following to work:

1. require module B
2. quibble module A
3. load module C

We would expect module C to reference B, which references the quibbled version of A.
Instead, it references the original non-quibbled version.

This seems to happen because the loader, when processing C's `require('./B')`,
sees that B itself is not quibbled, and therefore loads it normally.

And because B is already cached, and that version references the
non-quibbled version of A, we pull in the non-quibbled A as well.

This commit just adds a (failing) test for the issue. I don't have a
sufficient understanding of quibble's internals to try to write a fix as
well.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant